Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Coastal Growers Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1979No. Nos. 76-3052, 76-3053, 76-3054 and 76-3117PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHANON, District Judge:

At issue are certain district court decisions determining appellants to be “farm labor contractors” within the meaning of the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act (hereinafter “the Act”) 7 U.S.C. § 2041 et seq. Four cases have been consolidated for appeal purposes, all involving organizations which have never obtained certificates of registration under the Act.

Appellants’ organizational structures and business operations are substantially identical. Appellants all are organized under the California nonprofit cooperative association law and by statutory definition are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brennan v. KeyserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Usery v. Coastal Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Amado Salazar-Calderon, Cross-Appellees v. Presidio Valley Farmers Association, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Paulina Castillo v. Ercell GivensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Caro-Galvan v. Curtis Richardson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API