Legal Opinion
Tipler v. Crafton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 28, 1941No. 4-6306PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin 'Smith, C. J.
The issue is whether, within the period of limitation, an amended complaint when' considered with the original, stated a cause of action. The trial court held that, it did not.
The suit was brought by Jesse Tipler as administrator of the estate of Frank Tipler. It was alleged that a truck operated by a servant of James and Rupert Crafton 1 was negligently parked on Highway No. 61 near Hayti, in the state of Missouri, in consequence of which an automobile driven by Walker Crawford struck the back end of the truck and fatally injured Frank Tipler, who was with Crawford.
It is conceded appellants’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Goldschmidt v. Pevely Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Coover v. Moore & WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Reardon v. Balaklala Corsol. Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGinty v. Ballentine Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Wallace Glick, by His Next Friend, Bessie McGinty and Bessie McGinty v. Ballentine Produce, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Wheeler v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Crowder ex rel. Crowder v. Gordons Transports, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1967