Rubalcava v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (A. M.), P. J.
In this review proceeding, we conclude respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) erred in rescinding the finding of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) that petitioner’s earning capacity is sufficient to produce permanent disability indemnity at the maximum rate under Labor Code section 4453, subdivision (c)(4). 1
Petitioner (applicant) admittedly sustained industrial injury to her left hand on April 10, 1986, when her fingers were amputated by a cheese grinder she was operating in the course of her employment by defendant Pizzamania, insured by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Chu v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Crown Appliance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004