Legal Opinion

Decornick Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2017No. 15-5473UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Decornick Moore seeks to vacate his federal drug conspiracy conviction because his defense counsel erroneously told him during plea negotiations that the statutory minimum and maximum for his offense were ten years and life—in truth, they were five years and forty years. The district court denied petitioner’s motion to vacate, holding that he failed to establish that this change in information would have caused him to reject his plea agreement and proceed to trial. We agree and affirm.

I

The government indicted Decornick Moore and twelve others on one count of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cameron Harris v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
  2. Hunt v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. Lancaster v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. McGuire, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
  5. Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API