Legal Opinion

Hoeppel v. Westover

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 14, 1948No. 7959-BPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, District Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of income taxes alleged to have been erroneously and illegally exacted from plaintiffs by the defendant Collector of Internal Revenue.

Plaintiff John II. Hoeppel was retired from the Regular Army of the United States on August 16, 1921, after thirty years of meritorious service and his retirement was in the grade of Master Sergeant. See Title 10 U.S.C.A. § 1028c.

In the year 1942 Mr. Hoeppel received from the Government the sum of $1665.00; in the following year he was likewise paid $1914.47. Pursuant to law, these two payments were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Marcum v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  3. Paxton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  4. Bickford v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  5. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kruger v. KrugerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Wilkerson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. Emmanuelli Romaní v. Secretario de Hacienda de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Swofford v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PorterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API