Legal Opinion

Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 31, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2988Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Inc., Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-3083 (DLF) WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION For a second time, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. attacks the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms rule that essentially banned bump stocks—firearm accessories that allow semiautomatic firearms to fire continuously with a single trigger pull. See Bump-Stock-Type Devices (Final Rule), 83 Fed. Reg. 66,514, 66,514–16 (Dec. 26, 2018). Earlier this year, the Coalition sought a preliminary…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API