Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alley v. Peeso

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. 6,592Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

I agree with all that is said in the foregoing opinion, except in so far as it limits defendant’s recovery to 5,000 shares of stock.

Plaintiff testified: “I have between five and six thousand shares.” He also said that he had transferred 123,500 shares to his brother in November, 1927, retaining in himself a proxy to vote the stock. He expected to get some of that back after reaching a settlement of business matters with his brother. When asked as to how much he expected to have returned to him, he said: “I probably will get 15,000 shares, maybe more or less.” He was asked: “You estimate when…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Milkman v. OrdwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Cole v. GetzingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Combs v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API