Metropolitan Bank v. . Van Dyck
New York Court of Appeals
The respondents in the first above entitled cause are banking associations, organized under the general banking law of this State, and the several acts amendatory thereof, and are located and doing business in the city of New York. By the provisions of those acts, the said banks were required to deposit securities with the bank department for the redemption and payment of the bills or circulating notes issued by such banks respectively.
Read the full summary
The respondents in the first above entitled cause are banking associations, organized under the general banking law of this State, and the several acts amendatory thereof, and are located and doing business in the city of New York. By the provisions of those acts, the said banks were required to deposit securities with the bank department for the redemption and payment of the bills or circulating notes issued by such banks respectively. Upon default of any such bank, upon lawful demand, to pay any such note or bill “in the laioful money of the "United States, the holder of such note was…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The question presented for our determination in these actions is one of the gravest importance, and challenges our most careful consideration. We are called upon to annul and set aside an act of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Riddlesbarger v. McDanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Rodes v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Kimpton v. BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Smith v. Havens Relief Fund SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.