Legal Opinion

People v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention in his pro se supplemental brief that the police found narcotics on his person as the result of an illegal warrantless “strip search” is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Wellington, 84 AD3d 984, 985 [2011]; People v Fleming, 65 AD3d 702 [2009]; People v Garcia, 284 AD2d 106 [2001]). The defendant’s failure to raise and litigate the issue during the pretrial suppression hearing, and not a failure of proof by the People, resulted in evidence of the legality of the search remaining undeveloped and unaddressed (see People v Cabrera, 61 AD3d 884 [2009]).

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API