Legal Opinion
Barnhill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 11, 2001No. 5D00-3518PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
788 So.2d 313 (2001)
Arthur BARNHILL, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-3518.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 11, 2001.
Arthur Barnhill, Mayo, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ORFINGER, R.B., J.
Arthur Barnhill appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief and correction of sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a).[1] In his motion, Barnhill argues that he was improperly deemed an habitual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Rhodes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AYALA-LAIES v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Ruiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Fillmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Greathouse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003