Legal Opinion
United States v. Miller
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 6, 1967No. Civ. A. No. W-3831PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
THEIS, District Judge.
This is an action to recover the balance on two promissory notes. The defendants Miller admit the execution of the notes and receipt of value, but plead the Kansas statute of limitations as a defense. The Court finds, as a preliminary matter, that it has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties to the action.
The facts are not disputed and may be briefly stated. On May 15, 1933 and September 15, 1933, the defendants George E. Miller and Pearl Miller executed and delivered to the Secretary of Agriculture, acting pursuant to the Act of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Person v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- States v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996