Legal Opinion

State v. Ralph

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 26, 1990No. 89-1782-CR, 89-1783-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

The state appeals from an order granting Richard Ralph's motions to modify his sentences. We deem the issues to be whether: (1) the fact that an accomplice received a lesser sentence is a "new factor" where the trial court was informed at sentencing that the lesser sentence had been recommended for the accomplice; (2) the fact that the accomplice had previously served jail time is a new factor where the trial court was informed at sentencing only that the accomplice had a past record; and (3) whether we may sustain the trial court's reduction of Ralph's sentence because the original sentence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Haskins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Scott v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. GiebelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. State v. GrindemannCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. State v. ScaccioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. State v. Adrean L. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API