State ex rel. Lloyd v. Rotwitt
Montana Supreme Court
MaNDAmus to compel the secretary of state to perform certain acts.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Witt, J.
— This is a hearing upon the return of an alternative writ of mandamus. The alternative writ of this court was issued September 24th, commanding the secretary of state to perform certain acts, or show cause, on September 27th, why he should not be required so to do. The question involved is the refusal of the secretary of state to do certain acts alleged by relator to be his duty, enjoined by the Ballot Law of 1889 (Laws 16th Sess., p. 135). To arrive at an understanding of the question presented the following facts may be stated: The constitution of the state provides: “At the general…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Gaines v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- McAunich v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schintz v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Frantz v. County Court of Wyoming Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. McCarthyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. WoodmanMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Palmer v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1896