Legal Opinion
City of Fort Lauderdale v. June Dhar
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 25, 2016No. SC15-359PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLabarga, C.J.
The City of Fort Lauderdale appeals the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in City of Fort Lauderdale v. Dhar, 154 So.3d 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). In that decision, the district court held a provision in section 316.0083(1)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), known as the “Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Program,” to- be invalid as applied to short-term renters of motor vehicles who are detected by a “red light camera” committing a violation. This Court has mandatory appellate jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(1), of the Florida Constitution. 1 For the reasons set forth herein, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Fla. Dept. of Rev. v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- City of Miami v. McGrathSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Crist v. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Eddie Wayne Davis v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- & SC15-2292 Venice HMA, LLC d/b/a Venice Regional Medical Center v. Sarasota County and Sarasota Doctors Hospital, Inc. v. Sarasota CountySupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- City of Oldsmar v. TrinhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Bean v. University of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Hayes Robertson Group v. CherryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.