Legal Opinion

People v. Strickland

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1977No. Docket 28472PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This appeal* 1 requires that we either extend or limit the following holding in People v McMiller, 389 Mich 425, 434; 208 NW2d 451 (1973).

"[W]e hold that upon the acceptance of a plea of guilty, as a matter of policy, the state may not thereafter charge a higher offense arising out of the same transaction.”

The precise question presented is this: Where a defendant charged with two armed robberies pleads guilty in one case in return for dismissal of the other, may the prosecutor later reinstate both charges if the defendant successfully appeals his plea-based conviction?

The present case is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. GolochowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. O'BRIENMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. PotterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. FlanaganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. SolakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API