Legal Opinion

Ropes v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This case was decided by the Court En Banc. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

1Per curiam

On April 2, 1903, a decree was entered in the Circuit Court of Volusia county, setting aside a sheriff’s deed held by E. E. Ropes upon certain lands, claimed by William McCabe. An appeal was taken from this decree, but on a suggestion to this court of the death of McCabe between the entry of the decree and the entry of the appeal, the appeal was dismissed May 4, 1904. Ropes v. McCabe. 47 Fla. 289, 36 South. Rep. 715. On July 4, 1904, Ropes filed a bill against Leopold Goldman, John L. Lake and William B. Taylor, as executors of the last will of William McCabe, deceased, to revive the decree.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pace v. Ficklin'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  3. Hopper v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Sambs v. SteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ropes v. McCabeSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams' Administrator v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  2. Rowray v. McCarthyWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. McNennySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gulf Fertilizer Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Belvin v. BelvinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API