Legal Opinion

McCue v. Tunstead

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1885No. 9,849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

This was an action for the recovery of the possession of certain personal property, to wit: a horse, bought under section 509 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff “ for the sum of one thousand dollars, and for interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent, per annum, amounting to $445, and for costs.” The defendant appealed from the foregoing judgment, and on the argument the plaintiff confessed error. On a former appeal in this case, taken by the plaintiff, against whom judgment was rendered on the first trial, the judgment of the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. McCue v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cummings v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Twohy Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Tunstead v. NixdorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hanchett v. HumphreysU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API