Legal Opinion
H. H. Leet Furniture Co. v. City of Richmond
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided January 19, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Judge.
The four appellants are engaged in operations of separate retail furniture stores in Lexington. Appellee, City of Richmond, a city of the third class, has an ordinance which provides in part:
“AN ORDINANCE
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, KENTUCKY IMPOSING CERTAIN PRESCRIBED LICENSE FEES OR TAXES FOR EXERCISING CERTAIN PRIVILEGES AND ENGAGING IN CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS, TRADES AND PROFESSIONS IN SAID CITY; REQUIRING SUCH FEES TO BE PAID FOR AND DURING EACH LICENSE YEAR FROM MAY FIRST TO THE NEXT SUCCEEDING APRIL THIRTIETH; STATING THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH SAID LICENSES ARE…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Mayfield v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Karnes v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Evers v. City of MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- W. T. Sistrunk & Co. v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Young & Jones v. Town of CampbellsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Georgetown v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962