Legal Opinion

Meader v. Scott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was an action on hoolc account, and was brought before the Court on objections filed to the following report of the auditors-made in the cause : “ Upon hearing the testimony introdticed'ih support of the parties’ claims, the auditors allowed the whole of the plaintiff’s account, excepting one item of $2,50 for making a coat, which appeared to have been twice charged by mistake.

Read the full summary

This was an action on hoolc account, and was brought before the Court on objections filed to the following report of the auditors-made in the cause : “ Upon hearing the testimony introdticed'ih support of the parties’ claims, the auditors allowed the whole of the plaintiff’s account, excepting one item of $2,50 for making a coat, which appeared to have been twice charged by mistake. They also allowed the whole of the defendant’s account against the plaintiff at $25,07, including interest from the 1st of January 1830 ; from-which deducting $8,13. the amountof plaintiffs account; including…

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court. — This was an action on book account, brought by the plaintiff as surviving partner of the firm of Meader & Eames. The auditors report that,there was a sum of eight dollars thirteen cents on the books of Meader & Eames against the defendant, which was rightly charged to the defendant; that the defendant had also an account against Meader & Eames, oí four dollars and ninety six cents,and also an account of eighteen dollars and seventy five cents against Meader alone, which was for boarding certain hands employed by Meader, after the death of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meader v. LeslieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. Rutland & Addison Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API