Legal Opinion

Demoss v. State of Michigan

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 17, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01674Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 NATASHA NAKISHA DEMOSS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01674-MMD-DJA 7 Petitioner, ORDER 8 v. 9 STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 This action was initiated as a habeas corpus action by Petitioner Natasha Nakisha 13 DeMoss on October 4, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) DeMoss paid the $5 filing fee. (Id.) The Court 14 has examined DeMoss’s petition and will dismiss this action for the reasons stated below. 15 A federal court cannot grant habeas relief where the petition plainly shows that the 16 petitioner is not entitled to such relief. See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API