Demoss v. State of Michigan
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 NATASHA NAKISHA DEMOSS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01674-MMD-DJA 7 Petitioner, ORDER 8 v. 9 STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 This action was initiated as a habeas corpus action by Petitioner Natasha Nakisha 13 DeMoss on October 4, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) DeMoss paid the $5 filing fee. (Id.) The Court 14 has examined DeMoss’s petition and will dismiss this action for the reasons stated below. 15 A federal court cannot grant habeas relief where the petition plainly shows that the 16 petitioner is not entitled to such relief. See…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.