Legal Opinion

James A. Howard v. Colbert Higgins, Sheriff, Murray County, Sulphur, Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1967No. 9115_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by Howard under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, with federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). The substance of the pro se claim is that the defendant, while acting as the sheriff of Murray County, Oklahoma, deprived the claimant of personal property valued at $500 while the claimant was in the sheriff’s custody.

The trial court dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdictional amount required by statute, but granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis. An appointed attorney filed a brief and argued the case for Howard. The defendant, Higgins, did not appear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. CarpenterDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
  2. Ream v. HandleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. Joe Louis Milk Co. v. HersheyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 356, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,166 Pete Gomez v. Florida State Employment ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Bradford Audio Corporation v. Edward Pious, Individually and as Purported Receiver of Bradford Audio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Willy H. Willis v. Thomas B. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API