Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 1989No. 88-1147PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from judgment presents two issues. Because we resolve the procedural issue, involving the propriety of a Rule 60(b) motion, in favor of the appellant, we must also address the substantive issue involving the enforcement of a settlement agreement.

Forrest Ingram sued Sam Pollock on October 14, 1987, alleging fraud. During the pendency of the suit, counsel for the parties corresponded regarding the terms and conditions of a possible settlement agreement. A dispute arose over whether the proposed but unexecuted document…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bownes v. Winston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Phillips v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Grayson v. HansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Price-WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Morrison v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API