Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Survant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1946No. 4-7812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This suit was filed by R. S.. Clark and L. K. Survant to enforce the specific performance of a contract to lease a certain building owned by Arthur Rhodes in the City of Camden, to be used as a cafeteria. The only' parties to the contract were Survant and Rhodes, but the complaint alleged that at the time of the execution of the contract, and at all times since, Clark was and has been a partner of Survant, and as such was entitled to the benefit and subject to the obligations of the lease agreement. Inasmuch as Clark was not named as a party to the lease agreement, the court, on motion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Justice v. HochSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson Regional Medical Cntr. v. Dr. Robert HaltermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. McKinney v. Jones.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Country Gentleman, Inc. v. HarkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API