Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Loyer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1988No. Docket 79605Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partT. K. Boyle, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for second-degree murder, and the majority affirms his conviction. I concur. The majority, however, purportedly declares a state statute unconstitutional, but holds that the error involved in applying the statute was harmless. I disagree that the statute is unconstitutional, but I concur in the result because I deem such declaration dicta in light of the holding of the majority.

I disagree with the majority’s declaration of unconstitutionality for several reasons. First, the application of the Equal Protection Clause to the statute is seriously flawed.

Secon…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API