Legal Opinion
Howard Ex Rel. Howard v. St. Joseph Transmission Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, a minor, sues by next friend to recover the sum of $100,000 for personal injuries suffered by him and alleged to have been caused by defendant's negligence. The petition charges:
"Plaintiff, for amended cause of action, states that James W.A. Howard, Sr., is duly appointed next friend, for the purpose of prosecuting this suit; that the defendant herein is a corporation, duly incorporated and operating under the laws of the State of Missouri; that defendant, at all times herein, negligently operated and maintained a high-power electric service line, in a public highway; that said…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Harrison v. Kansas City Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Kelly v. BenasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Mayfield Water & Light Co. v. Webb's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Fuchs v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gladden v. Missouri Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Hamilton v. Laclede Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Bridges Ex Rel. Bridges v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Donovan v. Union Electric CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Foote v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.