Legal Opinion

Ho v. Brookline Rent Control Board

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 29, 1992Published

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, P.J.

The defendant John Doyle (“landlord"), owner of a rent-controlled apartment leased to the plaintiffs George Ho and Man Ju Ho (“tenants”), sought to evict the Ho family in 1989 pursuant to article XXXVIII of the Brookline By-Laws, which allows landlords to evict tenants when there is a good faith intent to provide the rental unit to a close relative. The landlord’s original application for a certificate of eviction incorrectly named two of the tenants’ daughters rather than the tenants themselves. The certificate of eviction was granted after a hearing before the Rent Control Board of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Dickinson v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Moroni v. BrawdersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API