Legal Opinion
Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Capital City Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 2, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.
The assignor of the Ambassador Holding Corporation rented a store to the defendant Gluckstern. The lease provided that “ in case any damage or injury occurring to the glass in the store or damage and injury to the said premises of any kind whatsoever, then the said tenant shall cause the said damage or injury to be repaired as speedily, as possible at their own cost and expense.” The plaintiff insured the Ambassador Holding Corporation against loss on account of bodily injuries suffered by reason of its ownership of these premises. The infant defendant Feder was injured by the fall of glass…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Lord & Taylor, Inc. v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Pott v. NathansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Employers' Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Capital City Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928