Legal Opinion
Van Camp v. AT & T Information Systems
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 19, 1991No. Civ. No. 90-73363PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND
COHN, District Judge.
This case involves a claim of age and sex discrimination in violation of Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, Mich.Stat. Ann. § 3.548(101) et seq. [M.C.L.A. § 37.-2101 et seq.] (Callaghan 1990). The complaint, filed on October 12, 1990 in the Wayne County Circuit Court, alleged that plaintiff Deraid Van Camp (Van Camp), an employee of defendant AT & T Information Systems (AT & T), was ordered transferred to New Jersey from Michigan because of his age and sex, in violation of Elliott-Larsen, and that his only alternative…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brinker v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Camp v. AT & T Information SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Benitez v. North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- 58 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1124, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,445, 15 Employee Benefits Cas. 1366 Derald Van Camp, Patricia Van Camp v. At & T Information Systems, a Delaware Corporation, William Bugera, David E. Crimer, and Marise E. Stephens, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992