Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Central Crosstown Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the.plaintiff from a judgment, dismissing the complaint, rendered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

In view of the dismissal of the complaint, the testimony offered on behalf of the plaintiff must be accepted as true, ánd she is entitled to all inferences which a jury, had the *115case been submitted to it, might properly have found in her favor. Schiller v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 26 Misc. Rep. 392.

At about eight o’clock in the evening on the 31st day of July, 1899, the plaintiff, a washerwoman, carrying a large basket filled with linen, boarded one of the defendant’s cars at Ninth street and First avenue. Immediately upon paying her fare, she asked and obtained of the conductor a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Poulin v. . Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Schiller v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crump v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Gillespie v. Yonkers R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Gillespie v. Yonkers RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API