Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Pulaski v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1984No. 82-1259PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendants, First National Bank of Pulaski, Tennessee, (Bank) and Parmenas Cox and Robert Curry, individually and doing business as a partnership, Cox and Curry Insurance Agency in Pulaski, Tennessee, from a judgment for plaintiffs, Carl R. and Delma M. Thomas. We affirm.

The town of Ardmore is located in the northern part of Limestone County, Alabama, and is separated from the town of Ardmore, Tennessee, by Main Street. The Ardmore branch of the Bank fronts on the northern, or Tennessee, side. At the times material to this case, Parmenas Cox was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gene M. Oswalt Et Vir v. Scripto, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Tokai-Seiki Kk, a Japanese Corporation, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Highlands Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Elegante Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. DeSotacho, Inc. v. Valnit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. IMAC Energy, Inc. v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Atlanta Auto Auction v. G & G Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Stewart v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API