Legal Opinion

In re Dillman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1936No. Docket No. 147, Calendar No. 38,818PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In the proceedings to condemn a reciprocal negative easement in connection with the widening of Woodward avenue and relocation of the right of way of the Grand Trunk Railway, Johnstone v. Railway Co., 245 Mich. 65 (67 A. L. R. 373), compensation of $1,520 was awarded and the title owners, vendees under land contract, and appellant mortgagee were named as awardees generally and without determination of their specific rights in the fund. On petition of a contract vendee the award was amended by striking the name of appellant therefrom,'and it appeals.

Appellant’s mortgage was dated March 9,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Utter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. City of Detroit v. Fidelity Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Detroit, Bay City & Western Railroad v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. City of Chicago v. SalingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Orange Tp. v. EMPIRE MORTG. SERVICESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. TruslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. In Re D'EllenaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API