Legal Opinion

Hines v. Blackmon

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 298-3601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant in error against plaintiff in error, for damages for personal injuries. 226 S. W. 142.

Defendant in error was an employee of plaintiff in error, and, at the time of his injury, was engaged with a coemployee, Tom Sutton, in carrying a railroad tie.

Plaintiff in error defended the action upon the ground of assumed risk, contributory negligence, and in the alternative that the alleged injuries were caused from an accident in which neither defendant in error nor his coemployee were negligent.

Plaintiff in error contends that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Erie Railroad v. PuruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Hines v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Texas Employer's Ins. Ass'n v. ThamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Minor v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API