Morillo v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Carro, J. P. (dissenting).
In this action by unleased occupants of New York City-owned in rem buildings to compel defendants to evaluate plaintiffs and those similarly situated for legal tenancies pursuant to New York City’s Unauthorized Occupant Policy (UOP), the proposed intervenors should have been granted leave to intervene, since it has been shown that each of them has a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the litigation (see, Plantech Hous. v Conlan, 74 AD2d 920, appeal dismissed 51 NY2d 862). In partially denying plaintiffs’ claims under the Equal Protection Clauses of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MATTER OF LEE v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- McCain v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- McCain v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Plantech Housing Inc. v. ConlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.