Legal Opinion

Barachkov v. Lucido

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 3, 2015No. Case No. 04-CV-73957, 04-CV-73977Published

1Opinion of the Court

*748OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MO- , TION FOR REINSTATEMENT , AND OTHER DECLARATORY RELIEF (ECF NO, 225) AND ORDERING DEFENDANT CHIEF JUDGE SEBASTIAN LUCIDO IN HIS OF- ■ FICIAL CAPACITY TO DEVELOP A PLAN WITHIN 60 DAYS TO REINSTATE PLAINTIFFS TO COMPARABLE POSITIONS WITH THE klB DISTRICT COURT AND EDIT PLAINTIFFS’ PERSONNEL FILES TO REFLECT THE. JURY’S VERDICT

PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs Patricia Barachkov, Nancy Englar, and Carol Diehl’s (“Plaintiffs”) Emergency Motion for Reinstatement (Case no. 04-73957, ECF No. 225).1…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API