Legal Opinion

Brady's adm'r v. Hill & Keese

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettibone, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Hill & Keese, plaintiffs in the Court below, for work and labor done for the defendant, &c. Plea, non-assumpsit, and notice of set-off. The notice was in these words: “the defendant gives notice to the plaintiffs, that on the trial of this cause he will claim a set-off for five thousand dollars, for lots in the town of Harrisonville, in the State of Illinois, for goods, wares and merchandise, for money lent and advanced, and for money paid, laid out and expended, by the defendant for the plaintiffs, before that time, sold and delivered, done and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evangelical Synod of North America v. SohoeneichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. County of Audrain Ex Rel. First National Bank of Mexico v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Rolla Produce Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Scott v. Mundy & ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. KnowlesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API