Commonwealth v. Raffensberger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*196CERCONE, President Judge:
Under our system, one accused of a crime is presumed innocent until the prosecuting attorney has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt to an impartial jury of the vicinage that he and the malefactor are identical, or that his actions match the definition or conform to the elements of the malefaction of which he stands accused. This presumption of innocence is but one of the many aspects of the fundamental law of our land. Like its counterparts, it emanates from the core concept which seeks to restrain governmental excess and prevent abuse by those exercising state…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. RevtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GilmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.