Legal Opinion

In Re the Contempt Hearing of Nasser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1994No. 11A04-9303-CR-115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Woodrow S. Nasser appeals a finding of direct contempt against him and raises essentially one issue: whether the court's finding of direct contempt is sustained by the evidence and the trial court's findings. Nasser was attorney of record for Larry D. Bemis, who was in jail and unable to make bond while awaiting prosecution on child molesting charges. The Clay Cireuit Court found Nasser to be in contempt of court for failing to appear for Bemis' jury trial. We affirm.

We note at the outset that Nasser was advised of the charges against him, had a reasonable opportunity to meet…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re Direct Contempt of CaitoIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Skolnick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hopping v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re the Contempt Hearing of NasserIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bellamy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Hopping v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the Contempt Hearing of NasserIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API