Legal Opinion

Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Currie

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 3 Div. 413. [fn*]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, .1.

The demurrers to plea 4 were properly overruled. The allegation ■in the plea, “that the amount then owing to the plaintiff by the defendant was in dispute between them,” is the statement of a fact, and not a conclusion. A dispute means a disagreement or- a bona fide contention between the parties, and, if honest, it affords the basis of an accord between the parties which the law favors, the execution of which is the satisfaction. In the case of i'ire Ins. Association v. Wickham, 141 U. S. 577, 12 S. Ct. 87, 35 L. Ed. 860, it is said:

“If there be a bona fide dispute as to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hand Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Mance v. . HossingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Laroe v. . Sugar Loaf Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Demars v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Preskitt v. LyonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API