Legal Opinion

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 23, 1972No. O-488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal challenges the correctness of a final summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact with respect to appellees’ liability for the damages suffered by appellants, and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. 23 Fla.Jur. 281, Negligence, § 37; DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Company (1955) 380 Pa. 484, 112 A.2d 372; Kite v. Jones (1957) 389 Pa. 339, 132 A.2d 683; Cotter v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. General Telephone Company of Florida, Inc. v. MahrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Cotter v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Tuz v. BurmeisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savage v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API