Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Goldner v. State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1977Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Herlihy, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I agree with the majority that the determination of the State Tax Commission must be confirmed as to the disallowance of deductions from gross income, but I disagree with the conclusion that insofar as the assessment was based on additional income it must be annulled.

It is well established that as to the assessment, all that is necessary is that it be founded upon a sound basis. "[W]e are required to confirm the determination if there are facts to sustain the determination which indicate that it was not arbitrary or capricious”. (Matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grace v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Hillman v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API