Legal Opinion
Lankford v. City of Hobart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1996No. 95-6027PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Linda Lankford and Nancy Cal-very brought charges against the City of Hobart alleging they were subjected to sexual harassment and discrimination by former Police Chief Quirino Medrano, Jr., in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as other federal and state law claims. A magistrate judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing all of plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs now appeal the dismissal of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Murrell Ex Rel. Jones v. School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Maestas v. State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Prince v. Sheriff of Carter CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Hom v. SquireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Settlemire v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.