Walker v. United States
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Three petitioners, pro se, file a motion attacking their sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and initially move to have their individual cases consolidated and considered jointly by the court. The court recognizes that pro se pleadings should be construed in a liberal and deferential manner. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). After a jury trial in this court, the petitioners were convicted of operating a continuing criminal enterprise and conspiracy to violate drug and firearm…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Logiudice v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005