Legal Opinion

Armstrong & Co. v. Barrett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Logan County; the Hon. G-. W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was an action of assumpsit brought by the appellee against the appellants upon a declaration containing only the common counts. The cause, by agreement of the parties, was submitted to the court for trial without the intervention of a jury. The finding and judgment of the court was in favor of the appellee.

The bill of exceptions sets out the entire evidence, and does not show the ultimate facts found by the court. The first and second assignments of error question the action of the court in admitting and refusing to admit evidence, but the briefs and arguments of counsel for appellants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. Chicago & Rock Island RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wood v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Tibballs v. LibbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hobbs v. Ferguson's EstateIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Northwestern Benevolent & Mutual Aid Ass'n v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bour v. Chicago & Wellston Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Brooks v. BradyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Bredhoff v. LepmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. BlackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. v. MurowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API