Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Harkins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. J. G. Eblen, special judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The state of the ease made by pleadings of the plaintiff, was that Harkins bought the land with Brinkley’s money, deposited in his hands for that purpose, and took the title' in his own name, instead of that of Brinkley, and afterwards promised to convey the land to. Brinkley, but died before doing it.

To this the defendants pleaded a general denial, which put in issue the existence of this state of facts, and placed upon the plaintiff the burden of proving such facts, in substance or legal effect, in order to sustain his cause of action.

The state of case made by the…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Conrad v. JudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Hess v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Stevens & Andrews v. Gainesville National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Clem v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API