Legal Opinion

Vereczkey v. Sheik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The relevant facts of his case are set forth in the decision on a companion appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 13, 2006 (see Vereczkey v Sheik, 57 AD3d 523 [2008]).

After the order dated October 13, 2006 was issued, the defendants Rheem Manufacturing Company (hereinafter Rheem) and A.F. Rockland Plumbing Supply Corp. (hereinafter AF) moved for leave to reargue and, in effect, to renew, based upon a new affidavit of their expert Jacob Hall stating that the discrepancy between the temperature setting on the thermostat and the actual temperature of water…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Roberts Consolidated Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Safrin v. DST Russian & Turkish Bath, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Soldano v. Bayport-Blue Point Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Vereczkey v. SheikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruno v. Thermo King Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API