Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Sikes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1932No. 9035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The first, and we think the controlling, issue is whether or not the question of title is res adjudicata. It appears without contradiction that the First National Bank of Claxton brought ejectment against W. F. Anderson to recover the land in question. Anderson filed an answer in which he set up the fact that he was in possession of the land as the head of a family under a homestead duly and previously set apart. That case proceeded to verdict and judgment. So far as the record discloses, that judgment has never been set aside or reversed. It is therefore conclusive, not only upon Anderson,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evans v. Piedmont National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Bartlett v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1870
  3. Wegman Piano Co. v. IrvineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Barfield v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Willingham v. SladeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. Bank of DahlonegaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. College Park Land Co. v. Mayor of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Fernandez v. Bank of DahlonegaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API