Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1985No. 14386Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

It is the preaccusatorial delay which is so very disturbing in this case. We hold, as I understand it, that this appellant may have suffered some prejudice as the result of preaccusatorial delay. Nonetheless, applying two relevant and fairly recent United States Supreme Court decisions, viz Marion and Lovasco, to the facts of this case, we ultimately conclude that there was a valid, good faith reason for the delay in filing the complaint against appellant. I *285agree that the burden is upon the State to establish justification for delay once delay and prejudice have been demonstrated. People v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lawrence v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
  3. People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. FrakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Weiss v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API