Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Town of South Carthage v. Barrett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1992PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The sole issue raised in this direct appeal is whether municipal or “corporation” courts may constitutionally exercise concurrent jurisdiction over state criminal offenses committed within the municipality’s boundaries. The Smith County Circuit Court held that the legislation (Tenn.Code Ann. § 6-2-403) granting such concurrent jurisdiction to the Municipal Court of the Town of South Carthage violates the separation of powers provisions of the Tennessee Constitution. We agree and affirm.

BACKGROUND

The parties have stipulated the following factual and procedural…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Maner v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of Elizabethton v. Carter CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Summers v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. Superintendent, Davidson County WorkhouseTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. Bredesen v. Tennessee Judicial Selection CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API