Legal Opinion

Union Pac. R'y Co. v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, La/rimer Cowity Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bissell, C.

This was a proceeding in garnishment, instituted by Bailey, as a judgment creditor of Gibson, to collect from the railway company the money claimed- to be due from it to Gibson. In the county court, from which, by appeal, the case comes here, judgment was rendered against the railway company for $30 and costs.

Under the law which determines and limits the liability of garnishees, the judgment against the company cannot be maintained. According to the settled rule governing such cases, the liability of the garnishee must be made affirmatively to appear in order to justify a judgment…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Richards v. StephensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. LanghorneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Brooks v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Bragdon v. BradtColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Bragdon v. BradtColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Denver, Texas & Fort Worth Railroad v. SmeetonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API