Legal Opinion
United States v. Kenneth Dale Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1973No. 72-1757Published
1Opinion of the Court
479 F.2d 251
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Dale HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-1757.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 1972.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 5, 1973.
Jerry E. Berg (argued), Palo Alto, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Joseph Reeves, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), John F. Cooney, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before LUMBARD,* HAMLEY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Olender v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Dit La Porte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath Atty. Gen. Of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Daniel Owen LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.